Sunday, January 20, 2013 Saturday, December 29, 2012 Thursday, November 29, 2012
I think bisexuals indeed experience more (personalized) negative response from the GGGG community (note that lesbians are also marginalized), but the overwhelming majority of erasure, pathologization, denial and silencing comes from the straight population and culture. Think of it this way: if bisexuality was accepted by the straight population, then bisexuals wouldn’t at all have need of joining LGBT communities. Seeing as we’re not even close, we seek out those communities as refuge – and subsequently experience rejection and end up heartbroken. But the reason that inner-LGBT biphobia feels more painful to us than straight biphobia isn’t that it’s more common or really worse, it’s simply because it’s more personal, coming from where we least expect it, from where we came seeking support. bidyke (2011)

(Source: bisexualftw)

Sunday, September 9, 2012
The Bisexual Community is not now and has never been made up of cisgender heteronormative/homonormative people only. People who repeat that painfully prejudicial falsehood are the equivalent of those who insist that “America is a Christian Nation” and then go on to bend themselves into historical and linguistic pretzels trying to prove their demonstrably false thesis. NYABN comments (via bialogue-group)
Saturday, August 25, 2012
…this year on Reddit, a bisexual guy posted, “I have tried to commit suicide over me being a bi guy who says he is gay, its hard living a lie.I feel alone in this I looked on google to see if anyone was in my situation I FOUND NONE. @BiNetUSA president Faith Cheltenham in her 2012 blog Google’s Bisexual Problem (via bisexualftw)
Thursday, August 9, 2012 Wednesday, July 18, 2012

bialogue-group:

Google’s Bisexual Problem If one of the biggest companies in the world decides to erase your identity, will anyone notice?

BiNet USA president Faith Cheltenham goes on HuffPost!Gay to takes on Google (and the silent complicity of the organized Gay/Lesbian Community) over it’s continuing block of the word bisexual from its Auto Complete and Instant Search features

To provide Google with more feedback, visit here.

oh my god that’s terrible

Sunday, June 24, 2012

What’s wrong when it comes to bisexuals in activism.

youjolgbtq:

Hello [Youjo],

It was nice to meet you last Sunday at All Souls!  Most often in public talks, I’ll use the simple term “gay” to refer to the entire LGBT community—it’s short.  I did use “LGBT” also—but that gets long and cumbersome to say over and over.  And if I forgot to say “bisexual” at all or enough—it’s just a hazard of public speaking—sometimes you don’t cover everything you mean to. 

 

I hope you’ll come to our PACE events and join up with us—there’s plenty of need and opportunities to make a difference here in Shreveport!

Best,

[Person that sent it]

This is why I’m probably not going to any events. I don’t want to sit anywhere just to be lumped in with people I’m not. I’m not gay, I’m bi, and I deserve the same respect! “Gay” is too commonly the “inclusive” term, and the second you say you’re not gay you must be a hetero-alley! I’m not accepting that, at all! The inclusive term is “Queer”!

The speaker only said LGBT 2 or 3 times, but said “gay and lesbian” MOST of the speech. Those words could easily be replaced with “queer” or you could say “homo and bi”. There are so many option, yet the bi-invisible ones are the most commonly picked. I see more and more proof that the only people that will fight for bi visible, rights, and respect are bis. It’s hurtful to me, but I’m up for task! I’m going to tell people how to write their speeches. I WILL WRITE MY OWN!

(Source: youjoqueer)

Friday, June 1, 2012

So many people accept gays and lesbians and completely disbelieve in bisexuality.

That sentence right there, has caused me and my friends so much grief.

taralys (via bisexualftw)
Saturday, May 12, 2012

Saying that bisexuality isn’t real won’t make it go away.

bialogue-group:

youknowyourebi:

YOU CAN CLAIM THAT GRAVITY ISN’T REAL EITHER BUT YOU KNOW WHAT IT’S GOING TO STAY BECAUSE IT DOESN’T CARE WHAT YOU THINK OF IT BECAUSE IT IS FUCKING GRAVITY. BISEXUALS ARE THE SAME WAY. 

However redefining bisexuality so narrowly that almost no one actually fits the definition; making up new hateful stereotypes that actually don’t include over a third of the modern bisexual movement’s founders & members; refusing to listen/acknowledge when the bisexual community defines itself (not to mention actually refusing to acknowledge that there IS a bisexual community); refusing to use the word bisexual and instead making up an ever increasing plethora of “new” or redefined words for bisexual; imposing bizarre, false and in some cases wildly contradictory “definitions” bisexuality on the community and playing oppression olympics whenever anyone tries to bring up concepts such as monosexism are dong a pretty good job of harming actual bisexual people.

(Source: forever-bifuri0us)

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

One more bit of rambling for now

bisexual-community:

avoicestentorian:

college guy comes out as bisexual. everyone thinks “he’s not ‘bisexual,’ he’s just not ready to come out as gay.”

college girl comes out as bisexual. everyone thinks “she’s not ‘bisexual,’ she’s just looking for attention.”

Yep! Or ‎as Louise McCudden recently pointed out, “Our society still promotes the belief that anyone who can choose between men and women will, in the end, choose a man for a life partner.”

(Source: a-voice-stentorian)

Monday, April 23, 2012 Sunday, April 15, 2012
bialogue-group:

chat-with-quill:

broadway-pony:

zggam:

fuckyeahbiactivism:

IMAGE:
HEADLINE: “LGB” charity Stonewall fails us… yet again
TEXT: And so, as the government’s consultation on how to implement same-sex marriage rolls out, Stonewall publishes its response. To one of the questions they say…
Question 8: The Government is not considering opening up civil partnerships to opposite-sex couples. Do you agree or disagree with this proposal? Stonewall’s Answer: This is a matter for heterosexual couples and Stonewall would recommend that the Government consults with them and stakeholder organisations representing them.
The thing is, lots of people who are in mixed-sex couples are not heterosexual. Perpetuating the myth that your relationship defines your sexuality helps perpetuate bisexual invisibility: it is a classic piece of bisexual erasure as identified in The Bisexuality Report (pub. 2012 Open University, endorsers including… Stonewall… talking the talk but not walking the walk). 
FURTHER TEXT: Bi people get into relationships with lesbians, gays, straight people and other bis.  Gay and lesbian people get into relationships with bis.  We are your queer family.  And LGB equality is only worthy of the name if we break down the barriers around civil partnerships as well as marriage: campaigning and lobbying for anything less puts the lie to a claim to be campaigning for equality for lesbians, gays and bisexuals. 
HEADLINE: Dear Stonewall, Not everyone in a mixed-sex relationship is straight… Do catch up!

Not cool, Stonewall. Not cool.
Broadway: thoughts?

whuuuuuuuuuuuuut 

I’m afraid I don’t understand… Could someone elaborate on the issue? Who is stonewall? What is the issue he’s talking about? Since when has civil partnership been an issue for opposite-sex couples, I thought it was created for same-sex couples to have similar legal rights. What does any of this mean? I’M NOT A WELL-INFORMED MAN

Stonewall is the biggest best known LGBT Rights charity in the UK. In the USA it would be comparable to HRC & the Task Force, but with a higher international profile and more actual formal clout with the government.
Many heterosexual (as well as some LGBTQ people) in many countries have made a determination that a Civil Partnership is the type of formal relationship that suites their lives. In New York City, (where it is nicknamed “marriage lite”) informal statistics seems to show that after the first rush, more heterosexual couples that LGBTQ couple were taking advantage of it. As Katherine and Tom, one British couple explained”
“For Tom and I, the role of the husband and the role of a wife seem very strict and that’s not for us,” she says, arguing that such categories derive from an era when women were subservient to men. “In our day-to-day life, we feel like civil partners, not a married couple.”
Tom, a civil servant, agrees. “We don’t feel like a husband and wife, we feel like partners,” he says.

bialogue-group:

chat-with-quill:

broadway-pony:

zggam:

fuckyeahbiactivism:

IMAGE:

HEADLINE: “LGB” charity Stonewall fails us… yet again

TEXT: And so, as the government’s consultation on how to implement same-sex marriage rolls out, Stonewall publishes its response. To one of the questions they say…

Question 8: The Government is not considering opening up civil partnerships to opposite-sex couples. Do you agree or disagree with this proposal?
Stonewall’s Answer: This is a matter for heterosexual couples and Stonewall would recommend that the Government consults with them and stakeholder organisations representing them.

The thing is, lots of people who are in mixed-sex couples are not heterosexual. Perpetuating the myth that your relationship defines your sexuality helps perpetuate bisexual invisibility: it is a classic piece of bisexual erasure as identified in The Bisexuality Report (pub. 2012 Open University, endorsers including… Stonewall… talking the talk but not walking the walk). 

FURTHER TEXT: Bi people get into relationships with lesbians, gays, straight people and other bis.  Gay and lesbian people get into relationships with bis.  We are your queer family.  And LGB equality is only worthy of the name if we break down the barriers around civil partnerships as well as marriage: campaigning and lobbying for anything less puts the lie to a claim to be campaigning for equality for lesbians, gays and bisexuals. 

HEADLINE: Dear Stonewall, Not everyone in a mixed-sex relationship is straight… Do catch up!

Not cool, Stonewall. Not cool.

Broadway: thoughts?

whuuuuuuuuuuuuut 

I’m afraid I don’t understand… Could someone elaborate on the issue? Who is stonewall? What is the issue he’s talking about? Since when has civil partnership been an issue for opposite-sex couples, I thought it was created for same-sex couples to have similar legal rights. What does any of this mean? I’M NOT A WELL-INFORMED MAN

Stonewall is the biggest best known LGBT Rights charity in the UK. In the USA it would be comparable to HRC & the Task Force, but with a higher international profile and more actual formal clout with the government.

Many heterosexual (as well as some LGBTQ people) in many countries have made a determination that a Civil Partnership is the type of formal relationship that suites their lives. In New York City, (where it is nicknamed “marriage lite”) informal statistics seems to show that after the first rush, more heterosexual couples that LGBTQ couple were taking advantage of it. As Katherine and Tom, one British couple explained”

“For Tom and I, the role of the husband and the role of a wife seem very strict and that’s not for us,” she says, arguing that such categories derive from an era when women were subservient to men. “In our day-to-day life, we feel like civil partners, not a married couple.”

Tom, a civil servant, agrees. “We don’t feel like a husband and wife, we feel like partners,” he says.

Monday, April 9, 2012 Sunday, March 18, 2012

Dear lesbian friend who shall remain nameless,

loveandasteadyhand:

When bisexual women come on to you, they are playing “tease the lesbian” and being “homophobic straight girls”.

When bi women don’t come on to you (and/or have too many male partners), they are “straight bisexuals”.

How, pray tell, does one prove to you that they are queer?

Love,

The Token Bi Friend.

(Source: bravedancing)