Thursday, May 2, 2013
bidyke:





[Image: Dark green grunge background. First line text: “Did you know?”. Second line image: 10 people symbols/silhouettes, of which 4.5 are colored dark orange, and 5.5 light orange. Third line text (large): “nearly 45% of bisexual youth have been bullied online”. Fourth line, smaller text: “By contrast, 19% of straight youth and 30% of gay youth experienced online bullying.” Fifth line: “STOP biphobia and monosexism!”]
The third in a series of infographics. First one. Second one.Source: Inequities in Educational and Psychological Outcomes Between LGBTQ and Straight Students in Middle and High School
The second chapter in my book: Bi: Notes for a Bisexual Revolution  is dedicated to explaining the effects of biphobia and monosexism.

bidyke:

[Image: Dark green grunge background. First line text: “Did you know?”. Second line image: 10 people symbols/silhouettes, of which 4.5 are colored dark orange, and 5.5 light orange. Third line text (large): “nearly 45% of bisexual youth have been bullied online”. Fourth line, smaller text: By contrast, 19% of straight youth and 30% of gay youth experienced online bullying.” Fifth line: “STOP biphobia and monosexism!”]

The third in a series of infographics. First one. Second one.

Source: Inequities in Educational and Psychological Outcomes Between LGBTQ and Straight Students in Middle and High School

The second chapter in my book: Bi: Notes for a Bisexual Revolution is dedicated to explaining the effects of biphobia and monosexism.

Monday, April 22, 2013
It’s not uncommon for people to come out as gay after being in heterosexual relationships. But when the gay/straight binary is so enforced, these storylines become a media trope that disregards bisexuality. Because Drew is now partnered with a man, he must be gay–no one mentions the idea that Drew could be bisexual. When closeted people only have the option of coming out as gay, as opposed to bi or queer, we perpetuate two harmful tropes: that there are only two sexual orientations, and that the gender of your partner determines your sexual identity. Eradicating biphobia within gay communities and gay media (via cbrachyrhynchos)
Sunday, April 21, 2013
ritchandfamous:

by request

ritchandfamous:

by request

Tuesday, April 16, 2013

cassaclysm:

if you discount LG’s from your accounts of biphobia then either you are very lucky to have never experienced that or you are internalizing something gross

Saturday, April 13, 2013 Monday, April 8, 2013 Thursday, March 28, 2013
Claiming that people who use the term bisexual must be touting a rigid binary view of gender, or denying the existence of gender variant people, is as presumptuous as assuming that people who use the term “bicoastal” must be claiming that a continent can only ever have two coasts, or that they are somehow denying the existence of all interior, landlocked regions of that continent. Julia Serano - “Bisexuality and Binaries Revisited” (via sightlesseyesofeternity)
Friday, March 1, 2013
autumnyte:

bialogue-group:

Where’s the ‘B’ in National LGBTQ Organizations? The Bisexual Representation Report Card
Given the overwhelming evidence in the past few years showing that bisexual persons exist in greater numbers than the combined gay male, lesbian and transgender populations, [Ed Note: with bisexuality being the largest sexual orientation group among trans* people there is some overlap] we must ask whether some of the American national queer organizations that send out donation requests demanding that we “demand equality for everyone” are themselves paying attention to the particular needs of bisexual folks, not merely as lip service, not just as an afterthought, but in any sort of tangible way.
Noting that none of ten prominent national US organizations includes the word “bisexual” or even the letter “B” in its name, long-time bisexual writer and activist Ron Suresha called and emailed media representatives of these groups about their bisexual policies and leadership. The communications contacts for these organizations were given a month to reply by phone or email .
Surprisingly, although they were given ample time and opportunity to respond to the few short, mostly yes-or-no questions, four organizations felt that the matter was not important enough to provide any answer at all and thus scored an F on this report card.

Note: the fact that there was no responses from some nonprofits does not indicate that they do not provide actual, even vital, services and support for their bi constituencies. For example NCLR, does a lot but sent a Terrible Message by being “too busy” to fill out a short form.On the other hand being chatty in their answers also doesn’t actually guarantee anything more than lip service.

People may wish to keep these results in mind the next time a group asks you to volunteer or for a donation.National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (The Task Force): A-
Point Foundation: B+
Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund: B
Marriage Equality USA: B-
Gay and Lesbian Medical Association (GLMA): B-
Log Cabin Republicans: D+
National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR): F (too busy)
Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD): F (didn’t bother to respond)
Human Rights Campaign (HRC): F (didn’t bother to respond)
National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association (NLGJA): F (didn’t bother to respond)
According to the responses, it appears that there is nobody devoted specifically to bisexual issues or bisexual advocacy in these groups. Additionally, people should keep in mind the fact that funders for LGBT Issues report only one $5K grant to a bi-specific organization was awarded out of nearly $77 million to LGBT programming in 2011.
Reacting to the survey results, Denise Penn MSW, a director at the American Institute of Bisexuality (AIB), stated:

In an effort to show inclusion of the bisexual community, many organizations have added a “B” to their name or added “bi programming.” Although well-intentioned, without education about bisexual issues, and with little funding for programming, many of these efforts come across as politically correct lip service rather than inclusion.



Thanks for adding that note about the overlap between bisexuality and trans* people, because that’s a key point that often gets overlooked in these discussions. 

autumnyte:

bialogue-group:

Where’s the ‘B’ in National LGBTQ Organizations? The Bisexual Representation Report Card

Given the overwhelming evidence in the past few years showing that bisexual persons exist in greater numbers than the combined gay male, lesbian and transgender populations, [Ed Note: with bisexuality being the largest sexual orientation group among trans* people there is some overlap] we must ask whether some of the American national queer organizations that send out donation requests demanding that we “demand equality for everyone” are themselves paying attention to the particular needs of bisexual folks, not merely as lip service, not just as an afterthought, but in any sort of tangible way.

Noting that none of ten prominent national US organizations includes the word “bisexual” or even the letter “B” in its name, long-time bisexual writer and activist Ron Suresha called and emailed media representatives of these groups about their bisexual policies and leadership. The communications contacts for these organizations were given a month to reply by phone or email .

Surprisingly, although they were given ample time and opportunity to respond to the few short, mostly yes-or-no questions, four organizations felt that the matter was not important enough to provide any answer at all and thus scored an F on this report card.

Note: the fact that there was no responses from some nonprofits does not indicate that they do not provide actual, even vital, services and support for their bi constituencies. For example NCLR, does a lot but sent a Terrible Message by being “too busy” to fill out a short form.

On the other hand being chatty in their answers also doesn’t actually guarantee anything more than lip service.
People may wish to keep these results in mind the next time a group asks you to volunteer or for a donation.
  1. National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (The Task Force): A-
  2. Point Foundation: B+
  3. Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund: B
  4. Marriage Equality USA: B-
  5. Gay and Lesbian Medical Association (GLMA): B-
  6. Log Cabin Republicans: D+
  7. National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR): F (too busy)
  8. Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD): F (didn’t bother to respond)
  9. Human Rights Campaign (HRC): F (didn’t bother to respond)
  10. National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association (NLGJA): F (didn’t bother to respond)

According to the responses, it appears that there is nobody devoted specifically to bisexual issues or bisexual advocacy in these groups. Additionally, people should keep in mind the fact that funders for LGBT Issues report only one $5K grant to a bi-specific organization was awarded out of nearly $77 million to LGBT programming in 2011.

Reacting to the survey results, Denise Penn MSW, a director at the American Institute of Bisexuality (AIB), stated:

In an effort to show inclusion of the bisexual community, many organizations have added a “B” to their name or added “bi programming.” Although well-intentioned, without education about bisexual issues, and with little funding for programming, many of these efforts come across as politically correct lip service rather than inclusion.

Thanks for adding that note about the overlap between bisexuality and trans* people, because that’s a key point that often gets overlooked in these discussions. 

Thursday, February 28, 2013
fuckmonosexismforever:

Yes, even if you’re gay.

fuckmonosexismforever:

Yes, even if you’re gay.

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

On a friend inadvertently discovering I’m bi

boringasfolk94:

Interesting story from, what, if memory serves, was Monday night.

So, a friend of mine from the LGBT society (this society, incidentally, being the only people who know about my sexuality) invited a bunch of people from the society and other places over to his, and then out to a club for his half birthday (since his birthday is in the summer).

Another friend of mine from my course, who’s been having a kinda tough week (or had been, rather), also wanted to come out, so I decided to ask if she wanted to come here. Which she did. And she brought wine, which I don’t normally drink, but when you don’t have the money for alcohol and are surrounded by people you don’t know, then hey, you take what you can get.

So later in the night, she goes out for a cigarette, I go with her cause she wants to talk about some stuff. So we do our fair share of bitching, and I wind up telling her that my ex-girlfriend was bi.

Her response?

“I don’t really trust bisexual people.”

I really just wanted to scream at her for that, but I didn’t, because it was in public and all. I really do regret not reacting probably as opposed to just quietly disagreeing.

Just before we go to the club, the guy who invited everyone over (who at this point is fairly intoxicated), turns and says to me “don’t tell everyone in LGBT that I was this drunk.” And so we laughed about that, and then one of his friends, who I actually knew, asked, in totally good nature, if I was gay. So I politely corrected her and said that I was bi.

After that, I turned to that friend who made the remark about not trusting bisexual people and just said, “feel free to stop trusting me now.”

And I think what’s great is that I don’t care how she reacts to that.

So,… Yeah, that was just a little story I felt like sharing

Thursday, February 21, 2013

voldemortcalmlypooping:

voldemortcalmlypooping:

what the fuck even is my sexuality: the musical

starring me

including great hits such as

oh no he’s hot

oh shit she’s hot too

why is everyone hot

and everyone’s favorite

how did i used to think i was straight?

(Source: eggrollkingdom)

Wednesday, February 13, 2013
arcadiansinthetardiswithsherlock:

btchflcks:

“Buffy the Vampire Slayer Week: Whedon’s Binary Excludes Bisexuality” by Erin Fenner
Willow is Whedon’s version of the answer to the underrepresented gay community. But, Willow appears to have had a healthy sexual relationship with her boyfriend Oz, and there is no hint at otherwise. She also pined for Xander for years. Both men. We see her gradually start a relationship with Tara, but she never talks about or reflects on her sexuality or coming out. We see that she is nervous about whether her friends approve. But, it doesn’t get much deeper than that. No characters have a deep conversation with her about her orientation. It’s not a thorough exploration. She goes from being with men to exclusively being with women and identifying as a lesbian. This is fine for Willow, but because there are really not many open gay or lesbian characters within the entire series we are dependent on her narrative alone.
[click here to read more]

I can appreciate Joss Whedon because he does write strong women. I think he did a lot for television but yes he is by no means perfect.
Willow going straight to gay was heartbreaking as a bisexual in the closet. I could recognize how this was a big step for lesbians but as a closet bisexual it was another thing that yet again made me feel there was something wrong with me. That what I’m feeling doesn’t actually exist and people are monosexual and therefore I’m some weird mutant that probably has some mental problem or something.
Even though I knew it wasn’t the case. But when I people don’t even entertain the idea non-monosexuality exists it just makes me feel like I’m some freak.
Willow was important for lesbians but she could have been just as important for bisexuals.
Joss won’t even really admit that his characters are bisexual. He just keeps saying they “experimented”.

Oh, yes, thank you. I remember being so excited when Willow and Tara started falling for each other, thinking, gosh this character is like me! She fell in love with men, and now she’s falling for a woman!
And then she just started calling herself gay… and that was heartbreaking for me in a way I can’t really explain. It was like the show was saying, no, people like you don’t really exist, how funny that you actually thought they could.

arcadiansinthetardiswithsherlock:

btchflcks:

Buffy the Vampire Slayer Week: Whedon’s Binary Excludes Bisexuality” by Erin Fenner

Willow is Whedon’s version of the answer to the underrepresented gay community. But, Willow appears to have had a healthy sexual relationship with her boyfriend Oz, and there is no hint at otherwise. She also pined for Xander for years. Both men. We see her gradually start a relationship with Tara, but she never talks about or reflects on her sexuality or coming out. We see that she is nervous about whether her friends approve. But, it doesn’t get much deeper than that. No characters have a deep conversation with her about her orientation. It’s not a thorough exploration. She goes from being with men to exclusively being with women and identifying as a lesbian. This is fine for Willow, but because there are really not many open gay or lesbian characters within the entire series we are dependent on her narrative alone.

[click here to read more]

I can appreciate Joss Whedon because he does write strong women. I think he did a lot for television but yes he is by no means perfect.

Willow going straight to gay was heartbreaking as a bisexual in the closet. I could recognize how this was a big step for lesbians but as a closet bisexual it was another thing that yet again made me feel there was something wrong with me. That what I’m feeling doesn’t actually exist and people are monosexual and therefore I’m some weird mutant that probably has some mental problem or something.

Even though I knew it wasn’t the case. But when I people don’t even entertain the idea non-monosexuality exists it just makes me feel like I’m some freak.

Willow was important for lesbians but she could have been just as important for bisexuals.

Joss won’t even really admit that his characters are bisexual. He just keeps saying they “experimented”.

Oh, yes, thank you. I remember being so excited when Willow and Tara started falling for each other, thinking, gosh this character is like me! She fell in love with men, and now she’s falling for a woman!

And then she just started calling herself gay… and that was heartbreaking for me in a way I can’t really explain. It was like the show was saying, no, people like you don’t really exist, how funny that you actually thought they could.

Back in grad school I did a talk on bisexuality with the GLBT student organization. One of the gay undergraduates said to me, “I think that when homosexuality is fully accepted, there will be no bisexuals.” And I said “I think when homosexuality is fully accepted, there will be more bisexuals than anything else.” I don’t know if that’s precisely true, but I do know that when someone tells me what their internal experience is, I believe them. When someone tells me they’re gay or lesbian, I believe them. When someone says they’re attracted to people without reference to gender, I believe them. When someone says they’re not interested in sex with anyone, I believe them. And I don’t think it takes a PhD in sex to recognize that each individual is THE ONE AND ONLY EXPERT on that individual’s sexuality. Asexuality is just another variation on human sexuality. We’re all made of the same parts, just organized in different ways. And if somebody says that’s their internal experience, well they’re the only ones who knows that. But why would gay people deny the existence of bisexuality, or fear and shun asexuals? Another experience from grad school: I had my first formal training about trans* stuff. We were talking about discrimination and hate crimes, and I asked, “Why does anyone feel threatened by transpeople? Why would anyone waste energy hating someone who isn’t doing anything to hurt anyone else?” (This was before the moral foundations research.) And my supervisor said, “How do you feel about your gender?” I thought about it for a minute and said, “Pretty good!” And she said, “People who hate trans people often don’t feel pretty good about their gender. Seeing someone else living their gender according to their own rules feels threatening because it means the rules about gender may not be worth following.” I do wonder how much of that dynamic goes into the fear and shunning that some gay folks express about bisexuals and asexuals. I wonder if they feel like there isn’t room in the tent for such diversity, when they’ve had to fight so hard for something as relatively simple (in its easy analogy with heterosexuality) as homosexual relationships. I can understand it, if that’s what’s going on. But I’m really, really ready for the world to move past that. the dirty normal (via panickyintheuk)
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Validation is probably the single most important factor determining whether an achieved bisexual identity can be positive. Validation can occur from within, but few of us are strong enough to establish and maintain a positive sense of identity alone. Validation from others affirms our feelings and recognizes that our experience of loving is what we say it is… When we cannot validate ourselves and when we are also denied validation by others, we may begin to doubt our experience or feel shame about it. Ann Fox (Bi Any Other Name: Bisexual People Speak Out, p. 35)

(Source: bisexualmind)